State ex rel. Yonkings v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Yonkings v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

1994 Ohio 216

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 19, 1994

Docket1993-2552

StatusPublished

This text of 1994 Ohio 216 (State ex rel. Yonkings v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Yonkings v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 1994 Ohio 216 (Ohio 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO The full texts of the opinions of the Supreme Court of Ohio are being transmitted electronically beginning May 27, 1992, pursuant to a pilot project implemented by Chief Justice Thomas J. Moyer. Please call any errors to the attention of the Reporter's Office of the Supreme Court of Ohio. Attention: Walter S. Kobalka, Reporter, or Deborah J. Barrett, Administrative Assistant. Tel.: (614) 466-4961; in Ohio 1-800-826-9010. Your comments on this pilot project are also welcome. NOTE: Corrections may be made by the Supreme Court to the full texts of the opinions after they have been released electronically to the public. The reader is therefore advised to check the bound volumes of Ohio St.3d published by West Publishing Company for the final versions of these opinions. The advance sheets to Ohio St.3d will also contain the volume and page numbers where the opinions will be found in the bound volumes of the Ohio Official Reports.

The State ex rel. Yonkings, Appellant, v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al., Appellees. [Cite as State ex rel. Yonkings v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr. (1994), Ohio St.3d .] Mandamus to compel prison officials to perform act of self- execution of relator's multiple definite sentences -- Writ denied, when. (No. 93-2552 -- Submitted March 1, 1994 -- Decided April 20, 1994.) Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No.93AP-655.

Charles B. Yonkings, pro se. Lee I. Fisher, Attorney General, and Joshua T. Cox, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

Per Curiam. The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed for the reason stated in the court's opinion, i.e., declaratory judgment provides an adequate remedy to appellant and its availability was thus an appropriate basis to deny the writ. State ex rel. Citizens for Fair Taxation v. Lucas Cty. Bd. of Commrs. (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 749, 752, 591 N.E.2d 691, 693; State ex rel. Fenske v. McGovern (1984), 11 Ohio St.3d 129, 11 OBR 426, 464 N.E.2d 525, paragraph two of the syllabus; R.C. 2731.05. Judgment affirmed. Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO The full texts of the opinions of the Supreme Court of Ohio are being transmitted electronically beginning May 27, 1992, pursuant to a pilot project implemented by Chief Justice Thomas J. Moyer. Please call any errors to the attention of the Reporter's Office of the Supreme Court of Ohio. Attention: Walter S. Kobalka, Reporter, or Deborah J. Barrett, Administrative Assistant. Tel.: (614) 466-4961; in Ohio 1-800-826-9010. Your comments on this pilot project are also welcome. NOTE: Corrections may be made by the Supreme Court to the full texts of the opinions after they have been released electronically to the public. The reader is therefore advised to check the bound volumes of Ohio St.3d published by West Publishing Company for the final versions of these opinions. The advance sheets to Ohio St.3d will also contain the volume and page numbers where the opinions will be found in the bound volumes of the Ohio Official Reports.

The State ex rel. Yonkings, Appellant, v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al., Appellees. [Cite as State ex rel. Yonkings v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr. (1994), Ohio St.3d .] Mandamus to compel prison officials to perform act of self- execution of relator's multiple definite sentences -- Writ denied, when. (No. 93-2552 -- Submitted March 1, 1994 -- Decided April 20, 1994.) Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No.93AP-655.

Charles B. Yonkings, pro se. Lee I. Fisher, Attorney General, and Joshua T. Cox, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

Per Curiam. The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed for the reason stated in the court's opinion, i.e., declaratory judgment provides an adequate remedy to appellant and its availability was thus an appropriate basis to deny the writ. State ex rel. Citizens for Fair Taxation v. Lucas Cty. Bd. of Commrs. (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 749, 752, 591 N.E.2d 691, 693; State ex rel. Fenske v. McGovern (1984), 11 Ohio St.3d 129, 11 OBR 426, 464 N.E.2d 525, paragraph two of the syllabus; R.C. 2731.05. Judgment affirmed. Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1994 Ohio 216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-yonkings-v-ohio-dept-of-rehab-corr-ohio-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack