State ex rel. Yonkings v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction

630 N.E.2d 365, 69 Ohio St. 3d 70
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 20, 1994·No. No. 93-2552·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed for the reason stated in the court’s opinion, i.e., declaratory judgment provides an adequate remedy to appellant and its availability was thus an appropriate basis to deny the writ. State ex rel. Citizens for Fair Taxation v. Lucas Cty. Bd. of Commrs. (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 749, 752, 591 N.E.2d 691, 693; State ex rel. Fenske v. McGovern (1984), 11 Ohio St.3d 129, 11 OBR 426, 464 N.E.2d 525, paragraph two of the syllabus; R.C. 2731.05.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Yonkings v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction, 630 N.E.2d 365, 69 Ohio St. 3d 70 (Ohio 1994).

630 N.E.2d 365 (State ex rel. Yonkings v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Porter v. Ward, 07 Ca 33 (10-2-2007)
2007 Ohio 5301 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)
Yonkings v. Wilkinson
1999 Ohio 98 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)
State ex rel. Earl v. Shafer
1999 Ohio 388 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)
State ex rel. Konoff v. Shafer
1997 Ohio 119 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1997)
Yonkings v. Wilkinson
674 N.E.2d 388 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1996)