State ex rel. Yonkings v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction
This text of 630 N.E.2d 365 (State ex rel. Yonkings v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed for the reason stated in the court’s opinion, i.e., declaratory judgment provides an adequate remedy to appellant and its availability was thus an appropriate basis to deny the writ. State ex rel. Citizens for Fair Taxation v. Lucas Cty. Bd. of Commrs. (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 749, 752, 591 N.E.2d 691, 693; State ex rel. Fenske v. McGovern (1984), 11 Ohio St.3d 129, 11 OBR 426, 464 N.E.2d 525, paragraph two of the syllabus; R.C. 2731.05.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
630 N.E.2d 365, 69 Ohio St. 3d 70, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-yonkings-v-ohio-department-of-rehabilitation-correction-ohio-1994.