State ex rel. Yonkings v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction

630 N.E.2d 365, 69 Ohio St. 3d 70
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 20, 1994
DocketNo. 93-2552
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 630 N.E.2d 365 (State ex rel. Yonkings v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Yonkings v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction, 630 N.E.2d 365, 69 Ohio St. 3d 70 (Ohio 1994).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed for the reason stated in the court’s opinion, i.e., declaratory judgment provides an adequate remedy to appellant and its availability was thus an appropriate basis to deny the writ. State ex rel. Citizens for Fair Taxation v. Lucas Cty. Bd. of Commrs. (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 749, 752, 591 N.E.2d 691, 693; State ex rel. Fenske v. McGovern (1984), 11 Ohio St.3d 129, 11 OBR 426, 464 N.E.2d 525, paragraph two of the syllabus; R.C. 2731.05.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Porter v. Ward, 07 Ca 33 (10-2-2007)
2007 Ohio 5301 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)
Yonkings v. Wilkinson
1999 Ohio 98 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)
State ex rel. Earl v. Shafer
1999 Ohio 388 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)
State ex rel. Konoff v. Shafer
1997 Ohio 119 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1997)
Yonkings v. Wilkinson
674 N.E.2d 388 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
630 N.E.2d 365, 69 Ohio St. 3d 70, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-yonkings-v-ohio-department-of-rehabilitation-correction-ohio-1994.