State ex rel. Yates v. State

186 So. 3d 1156, 2016 La. LEXIS 503, 2016 WL 900676
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedFebruary 5, 2016
DocketNo. 2016-KH-0201
StatusPublished

This text of 186 So. 3d 1156 (State ex rel. Yates v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Yates v. State, 186 So. 3d 1156, 2016 La. LEXIS 503, 2016 WL 900676 (La. 2016).

Opinion

In re Roger Yates; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. B, No. 248-553.

Relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion to amend and/or modify his sentence for immediate eligibility for probation or to suspend the remainder of his sentence and [1157]*1157memo in support of motion filed on or about May 18, 2014 and November 18, 2015. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motions. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon thé pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court.

The district court is ordered to provide this Court with a copy of its judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
186 So. 3d 1156, 2016 La. LEXIS 503, 2016 WL 900676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-yates-v-state-la-2016.