State ex rel. Wyatt v. Bagby

67 N.E. 519, 160 Ind. 669, 1903 Ind. LEXIS 121
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided May 26, 1903·No. No. 19,961·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Gxllett, J.

Appellant brought this action on the official bond of appellee Bagby to recover a penalty for an alleged act of extortion. It is stated in the brief of appellant that the action is instituted under the provisions of §8, Acts 1883, p. 48, §6549 Burns 1901. The act of March 31,1879 (Acts 1879, p. 130), which relates to the fees of constables for mileage in the service of process, was amended by the act of March 8, 1897, (Acts 1897, p. 217, §8060 Burns 1901), and therefore we assume that if the section of the act of 1879 relative to a civil penalty for extortion was not repealed by implication by said §8 of the act of 1883, it is nevertheless true that the latter section is the only statute which is bx’oad enough to authorize the recovery of a penalty for the act of extortion charged, if it amounts to an extortion. The section last mentioned creates only a personal liability on the part of the officer, and therefore an action on his bond will not lie. State, ex rel., v. Souder, 14 Ind. App. 472. See State v. Flynn, 157 Ind. 52.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Wyatt v. Bagby, 67 N.E. 519, 160 Ind. 669, 1903 Ind. LEXIS 121 (Ind. 1903).

67 N.E. 519 (State ex rel. Wyatt v. Bagby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Schilling v. Oklahoma City
1917 OK 501 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1917)
Eccles v. Walker
106 N.W. 977 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1906)