State ex rel. Wright v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Wright v. State

581 So. 2d 699, 1991 La. LEXIS 1871, 1991 WL 116343

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State ex rel. Wright v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1992 La. LEXIS 1932 →

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided June 21, 1991·No. No. 91-KH-1370·Published

Opinion

In re Wright, Hilton; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “G”, No. 268-605.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application for post-conviction relief he has filed on or about April 30, 1991. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file, and act upon the relator’s application which is herewith transferred to the district court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Wright, Hilton; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “G”, No. 268-605.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application for post-conviction relief he has filed on or about April 30, 1991. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file, and act upon the relator’s application which is herewith transferred to the district court.

State ex rel. Wright v. State, 581 So. 2d 699, 1991 La. LEXIS 1871, 1991 WL 116343 (La. 1991).

Pincite

581 So. 2d 699 (State ex rel. Wright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.