State ex rel. Woods v. Ratliff
This text of 322 S.W.2d 864 (State ex rel. Woods v. Ratliff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this proceeding relator seeks a preliminary writ of prohibition to prevent respondent Notary Public from swearing and taking the depositions of State’s witnesses, after the filing of felony complaints and before the holding of preliminary hearings. We agree with relator that our Rule 25.10, 42 V.A.M.S., permitting depositions “in any criminal case pending in any court” does not authorize the taking of depositions under these circumstances; a criminal case is not instituted or pending until an information is filed or an indictment returned. State v. Bithorn, Mo., 278 S.W. 685; State v. McNeal, 304 Mo. 119, 262 S.W. 1025. The issuance of a writ of prohibition is discretionary. Mansur v. Morris, Banc, 355 Mo. 424, 196 S.W.2d 287. We have determined that in this instance the ends of justice will best be served by declining to issue the writ. However, it is our view that the taking of depositions would be improper, and that the magistrate may proceed with the preliminary hearings.
Petition for preliminary writ of prohibition denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
322 S.W.2d 864, 1959 Mo. LEXIS 827, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-woods-v-ratliff-mo-1959.