State ex rel. Woods v. Ratliff

322 S.W.2d 864, 1959 Mo. LEXIS 827
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided April 13, 1959·No. No. 47544·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this proceeding relator seeks a preliminary writ of prohibition to prevent respondent Notary Public from swearing and taking the depositions of State’s witnesses, after the filing of felony complaints and before the holding of preliminary hearings. We agree with relator that our Rule 25.10, 42 V.A.M.S., permitting depositions “in any criminal case pending in any court” does not authorize the taking of depositions under these circumstances; a criminal case is not instituted or pending until an information is filed or an indictment returned. State v. Bithorn, Mo., 278 S.W. 685; State v. McNeal, 304 Mo. 119, 262 S.W. 1025. The issuance of a writ of prohibition is discretionary. Mansur v. Morris, Banc, 355 Mo. 424, 196 S.W.2d 287. We have determined that in this instance the ends of justice will best be served by declining to issue the writ. However, it is our view that the taking of depositions would be improper, and that the magistrate may proceed with the preliminary hearings.

Petition for preliminary writ of prohibition denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Woods v. Ratliff, 322 S.W.2d 864, 1959 Mo. LEXIS 827 (Mo. 1959).

322 S.W.2d 864 (State ex rel. Woods v. Ratliff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baughman v. State
430 S.E.2d 505 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1993)
State ex rel. Morton v. Anderson
804 S.W.2d 25 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1991)
State Ex Rel. Lucas v. Moss
498 S.W.2d 289 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1973)
State ex rel. Duddy v. Lasky
451 S.W.2d 352 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1970)
Kopper Kettle Restaurants, Inc. v. City of St. Robert
439 S.W.2d 1 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1969)