State ex rel. Woods v. Gagliardo

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Woods v. Gagliardo

360 N.E.2d 705, 49 Ohio St. 2d 196, 3 Ohio Op. 3d 279, 1977 Ohio LEXIS 340

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 2, 1977

DocketNo. 76-949

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 360 N.E.2d 705 (State ex rel. Woods v. Gagliardo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Woods v. Gagliardo, 360 N.E.2d 705, 49 Ohio St. 2d 196, 3 Ohio Op. 3d 279, 1977 Ohio LEXIS 340 (Ohio 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellee Woods, in effect, asks the Court of Appeals to reaffirm its decision in Walker v. Stokes, supra, and, thereby, reverse an interlocutory order of the trial court. A proceeding in mandamus is not a substitute for an appeal and it is not a vehicle for review ,of an interlocutory order of a lower court. State, ex rel. Dargett, v. Gessaman (1973), 34 Ohio St. 2d 55; State, ex rel. Overmeyer, v. Walinski (1966), 8 Ohio St. 2d 23.

Appellee has an adequate remedy by way of appeal. The judgment of the Court of Appeals granting the writ is, therefore, reversed.

Judgment reversed.

O’Neill, C. J., Herbert, Celebrezze, W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI