State ex rel. Woodrow v. McDonald

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Woodrow v. McDonald

575 So. 2d 378, 1991 La. LEXIS 414, 1991 WL 18340

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedFebruary 8, 1991

DocketNo. 91-KH-0240

StatusPublished

This text of 575 So. 2d 378 (State ex rel. Woodrow v. McDonald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Woodrow v. McDonald, 575 So. 2d 378, 1991 La. LEXIS 414, 1991 WL 18340 (La. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Woodrow, Arthur; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “H”, Nos. 10-76-356, 9-77-4.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application for post conviction relief he has filed on or about August 13, 1990. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Woodrow, Arthur; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “H”, Nos. 10-76-356, 9-77-4.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application for post conviction relief he has filed on or about August 13, 1990. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

575 So. 2d 378, 1991 La. LEXIS 414, 1991 WL 18340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-woodrow-v-mcdonald-la-1991.