State ex rel. Woodland v. Donnelly

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Woodland v. Donnelly

556 So. 2d 24, 1990 La. LEXIS 26, 1990 WL 620

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJanuary 4, 1990

DocketNo. 89-KH-2864

StatusPublished

This text of 556 So. 2d 24 (State ex rel. Woodland v. Donnelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Woodland v. Donnelly, 556 So. 2d 24, 1990 La. LEXIS 26, 1990 WL 620 (La. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Woodland, Terry; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs and writ of mandamus; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KW89-1951; Parish of East Baton Rouge, Nineteenth Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 8-79-342.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for production of documents he claims to have filed on or about March 14, 1988. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Woodland, Terry; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs and writ of mandamus; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KW89-1951; Parish of East Baton Rouge, Nineteenth Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 8-79-342.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for production of documents he claims to have filed on or about March 14, 1988. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

556 So. 2d 24, 1990 La. LEXIS 26, 1990 WL 620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-woodland-v-donnelly-la-1990.