State ex rel. Woodcock v. State
This text of 581 So. 2d 665 (State ex rel. Woodcock v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re Woodcock, George Jr.; — Plaintiffs); applying for writ of mandamus and supervisory and/or remedial writ.; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “I”, No. 275-167.
The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for new trial he has filed on or about February 19, 1991. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
581 So. 2d 665, 1991 La. LEXIS 1798, 1991 WL 102373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-woodcock-v-state-la-1991.