State ex rel. Wolfe v. Ross Corr. Inst.

942 N.E.2d 383, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1410
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 2, 2011
Docket2010-2141
StatusPublished

This text of 942 N.E.2d 383 (State ex rel. Wolfe v. Ross Corr. Inst.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Wolfe v. Ross Corr. Inst., 942 N.E.2d 383, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1410 (Ohio 2011).

Opinion

In Mandamus. Motion to strike is denied. Relator shall have ten days from the date of this order to file a memorandum in opposition to respondents’ motion to dismiss.

O’Connor, C.J., and Lanzinger, J., dissent and would grant the motion to dismiss.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
942 N.E.2d 383, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-wolfe-v-ross-corr-inst-ohio-2011.