State ex rel. Wolf v. Moore

46 P. 647, 15 Wash. 432, 1896 Wash. LEXIS 212
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State ex rel. Wolf v. Moore. Read the opinion of the Court — 16 Wash. 350
Washington Supreme Court·Decided November 5, 1896·No. No. 2278·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The alternative writ issued in this cause contained no recital of the facts set out in the petition upon which it was issued. Nor was there any reference therein to such petition, or direction that a copy thereof should be served with the writ. Respondent has interposed a demurrer which must be sustained. Whatever may have been the rule adopted by this court-before the act of 1895 (Laws1895, p. 117, §16 et seq.), under said act, it is clearly necessary that the facts relied upon as ground of relief should be set out either in the alternative writ or in a petition served therewith, and referred to therein.

The demurrer will be sustained with leave to file an amended writ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Wolf v. Moore, 46 P. 647, 15 Wash. 432, 1896 Wash. LEXIS 212 (Wash. 1896).

46 P. 647 (State ex rel. Wolf v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.