State ex rel. Wiseman v. Indus. Comm.
Opinion
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 92 Ohio St.3d 425.]
THE STATE EX REL. WISEMAN, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Wiseman v. Indus. Comm., 2001-Ohio-214.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 00-2158—Submitted June 20, 2001—Decided August 8, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 00AP-107. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________ Law Offices of Thomas Tootle Co., L.P.A., and Thomas Tootle, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Jeffrey B. Hartranft, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. __________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2001 Ohio 214 (State ex rel. Wiseman v. Indus. Comm.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.