State ex rel. Wilson v. Wilkinson

786 N.E.2d 56, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1505
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 31, 2003
Docket2003-0146
StatusPublished

This text of 786 N.E.2d 56 (State ex rel. Wilson v. Wilkinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Wilson v. Wilkinson, 786 N.E.2d 56, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1505 (Ohio 2003).

Opinion

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of relator’s motion for injunctive/declaratory judgment; relator’s motion for restraining order; relator’s motion to consolidate Supreme Court case Nos. 2003-0143, 2003-0144, 2003-0145, 2003-0146, 2003-0148, and 2003-0149; and respondents’ motions to dismiss,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to consolidate be, and hereby is, denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that respondents’ motions to dismiss be, and hereby are, sustained.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

The court finds that relator, Kenneth Jay Wilson, has abused his indigency status under S.Ct. Prac.R. XV(3) by filing numerous frivolous original actions for extraordinary relief. Accordingly,

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the Clerk of this court shall not accept for filing any additional original actions under S.Ct.Prac. R. X from Kenneth Jay Wilson, unless accompanied by the docket fee and security deposit required by S.Ct.Prac. R. XV(1) and (2).

Moyek, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook, Lundberg Stratton and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
786 N.E.2d 56, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1505, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-wilson-v-wilkinson-ohio-2003.