State Ex Rel. Willis v. Large
This text of 95 N.E.2d 691 (State Ex Rel. Willis v. Large) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petition contains no allegations of fact indicating that relator has been prejudiced by the acts complained of; that any electors have been deprived of the right to remonstrate; that offices of members of the board of education of the consolidated school district were unlawfully created; and that there was a usurpation of such offices. Therefore, the demurrer is sustained and, relator not desiring to plead further, a writ of ouster and induction denied.
Judgment for respondents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
95 N.E.2d 691, 154 Ohio St. 281, 154 Ohio St. (N.S.) 281, 43 Ohio Op. 167, 1950 Ohio LEXIS 426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-willis-v-large-ohio-1950.