State ex rel. Williams v. Turner

2012 Ohio 2575, 132 Ohio St. 3d 127
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJune 13, 2012
Docket2012-0085
StatusPublished

This text of 2012 Ohio 2575 (State ex rel. Williams v. Turner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Williams v. Turner, 2012 Ohio 2575, 132 Ohio St. 3d 127 (Ohio 2012).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition of appellant, Corey J. Williams, for a writ of habeas corpus. “[H]abeas corpus is not available to remedy a claim concerning the validity of an amendment to an indictment.” Haynes v. Voorhies, 110 Ohio St.3d 243, 2006-Ohio-4355, 852 N.E.2d 1198, ¶ 5. Williams’s “claim of sentencing error is not cognizable in habeas corpus, and he had an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law to raise the issue.” See Roberts v. Knab, 131 Ohio St.3d 60, 2012-Ohio-56, 960 N.E.2d 457, ¶ 1.

Judgment affirmed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Roberts v. Knab
2012 Ohio 56 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2012)
Haynes v. Voorhies
110 Ohio St. 3d 243 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2012 Ohio 2575, 132 Ohio St. 3d 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-williams-v-turner-ohio-2012.