State ex rel. Williams v. State

749 So. 2d 646, 1999 La. LEXIS 3395
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State ex rel. Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1997 La. LEXIS 1044
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided November 12, 1999·No. No. 99-KH-2636·Published

Opinion

In re Williams, Dwayne; — Plaintiff; applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. J, Nos. 374-848; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 99-K-1859.

Writs granted in part. The district court is ordered to appoint counsel for relators and hold a hearing at which it will determine whether the state’s failure to disclose a police report which contained [647]*647exculpatory impeachment material in the form of witnesses’ description of another person leaving the crime scene with a shotgun violated relators’ due process rights under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963) and progeny. The district court is also ordered to determine whether counsel’s failure to present the exculpatory testimony of these witnesses denied relators the effective assistance of counsel. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); Lord v. Wood, 184 F.3d 1083, 1093 (9th Cir.1999).

MARCUS, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Williams v. State, 749 So. 2d 646, 1999 La. LEXIS 3395 (La. 1999).

749 So. 2d 646 (State ex rel. Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brady v. Maryland
373 U.S. 83 (Supreme Court, 1963)
Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1984)