State ex rel. Williams v. Sieve

2011 Ohio 5258, 130 Ohio St. 3d 207
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 18, 2011·No. 2011-0959·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition of appellant, Daniel J. Williams Jr., for a writ of mandamus to compel appellee, Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas, Domestic Relations Division Judge Jon Sieve, to follow procedural law by hearing and considering oral arguments *208 before ruling on Williams’s motion to disqualify a court magistrate in a divorce case. Removal of a magistrate is within the judge’s discretion, In re Disqualification of Wilson (1996), 77 Ohio St.3d 1250, 674 N.E.2d 360, and mandamus will not lie to control judicial discretion, even if that discretion is abused. State ex rel. Avery v. Union Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 125 Ohio St.3d 35, 2010-Ohio-1427, 925 N.E.2d 969, ¶ 1. Williams has an adequate remedy by appeal to raise any claims of error in the domestic-relations case.

Daniel J. Williams Jr., pro se. Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Charles W. Anness, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Williams v. Sieve, 2011 Ohio 5258, 130 Ohio St. 3d 207 (Ohio 2011).

2011 Ohio 5258 (State ex rel. Williams v. Sieve) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Wesley v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas
2020 Ohio 4921 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2020)
Lingenfelter v. Lingenfelter
2017 Ohio 235 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2017)