State Ex Rel. Williams v. Lucas Cty. Ct., Unpublished Decision (11-2-2004)

2004 Ohio 5893
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 2, 2004
DocketCourt of Appeals No. L-04-1300.
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2004 Ohio 5893 (State Ex Rel. Williams v. Lucas Cty. Ct., Unpublished Decision (11-2-2004)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Ex Rel. Williams v. Lucas Cty. Ct., Unpublished Decision (11-2-2004), 2004 Ohio 5893 (Ohio Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY
{¶ 1} Relator, Robert A. Williams, has filed an application for writ of prohibition, and according to the information on his application, is an inmate in a correctional facility. R.C.2969.25 requires an inmate, at the time he or she commences a civil action against a government entity or employee, to attach an affidavit of all civil actions filed by him or her within the past five years. If an inmate fails to comply with R.C. 2969.25, his or her complaint for an original action will be dismissed. See State ex rel. Zanders v. Ohio Parole Bd. (1998),82 Ohio St.3d 421; State ex rel. Williams v. Markus, 8th Dist. No. 82440, 2003-Ohio-660, at ¶ 4.

{¶ 2} In this case, relator has failed to attach an affidavit as required by R.C. 2969.25. Moreover, although relator lists respondents as "Lucas County Court of Common Pleas, et al." the caption does not include any individual or the addresses of all the parties, as required by Civ.R. 10(A). Relator also seeks relief from the "Lucas County Prosecuting Attorney's Office" and the "Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction." The failure to properly caption an original action is sufficient grounds for denying the writ and dismissing the petition. SeeChisum v. Accused, 8th Dist. No. 82798, 2003-Ohio-2876, at ¶ 8, citing to State ex rel. Sherrills v. State (2001),91 Ohio St.3d 133. Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of prohibition is dismissed. Court costs of this action are assessed to relator.

Writ dismissed.

Handwork, P.J., Lanzinger, J., Singer, J., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re M.W.
2020 Ohio 178 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2004 Ohio 5893, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-williams-v-lucas-cty-ct-unpublished-decision-11-2-2004-ohioctapp-2004.