State Ex Rel. Wilkerson v. Baltimore County

Court of Appeals of Maryland

State Ex Rel. Wilkerson v. Baltimore County

146 A.2d 28, 218 Md. 271, 1958 Md. LEXIS 526

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedNovember 20, 1958

Docket[No. 51, September Term, 1958.]

StatusPublished

Cited by24 cases

This text of 146 A.2d 28 (State Ex Rel. Wilkerson v. Baltimore County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Ex Rel. Wilkerson v. Baltimore County, 146 A.2d 28, 218 Md. 271, 1958 Md. LEXIS 526 (Md. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Henderson, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This appeal is from a judgment for costs entered in favor of the defendant, appellee, Baltimore County, after a demurrer filed by it had been sustained without leave to amend. The declaration, in, two counts, alleged that Clarence Wilkerson had been fatally shot by the defendant, Louis DeManss, a *273 police officer, “regularly employed as an agent, employee and servant of the Police Department of Baltimore County”, and that the shooting was “in reckless disregard of human life and discarding those precautions proper to the circumstances,” and “without justification or excuse”. The trial court held that the County was not liable for the alleged tort of the police officer, because it was exercising a governmental function when it employed him.

We think the Maryland law on the point was settled in the case of Wynkoop v. Hagerstown, 159 Md. 194. The rule there stated is supported by the great weight of authority. See Borchard, Government Liability in Tori, 34 Yale Law Journ. 229, 240; Prosser, Torts (2d ed.) § 109; Restatement of Torts, sec. 887, comment (c) and sec. 888, comment (c) ; 18 McQuillin, Municipal Corporations (3d ed.) §§ 53.79, 53.80. We find no merit in the appellants’ argument that Baltimore County somehow stands in a different position because of the adoption of its present Charter under Article XI-A of the Maryland Constitution, and Code (1957), Art. 25A, sec. 1. If, as the appellants argue, the rule ought to be changed so as to enlarge the liability of municipal corporations, it must be done by the Legislature and not by this Court. Baltimore v. State, 173 Md. 267, 273; Cox v. Anne Arundel County, 181 Md. 428, 433. Cf. Howard v. South Balto. Gen. Hosp., 191 Md. 617, 619; and Thomas v. Prince George’s County, 200 Md. 554, 559.

Judgment affirmed, costs to be paid by the appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Henderson, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This appeal is from a judgment for costs entered in favor of the defendant, appellee, Baltimore County, after a demurrer filed by it had been sustained without leave to amend. The declaration, in, two counts, alleged that Clarence Wilkerson had been fatally shot by the defendant, Louis DeManss, a *273 police officer, “regularly employed as an agent, employee and servant of the Police Department of Baltimore County”, and that the shooting was “in reckless disregard of human life and discarding those precautions proper to the circumstances,” and “without justification or excuse”. The trial court held that the County was not liable for the alleged tort of the police officer, because it was exercising a governmental function when it employed him.

We think the Maryland law on the point was settled in the case of Wynkoop v. Hagerstown, 159 Md. 194. The rule there stated is supported by the great weight of authority. See Borchard, Government Liability in Tori, 34 Yale Law Journ. 229, 240; Prosser, Torts (2d ed.) § 109; Restatement of Torts, sec. 887, comment (c) and sec. 888, comment (c) ; 18 McQuillin, Municipal Corporations (3d ed.) §§ 53.79, 53.80. We find no merit in the appellants’ argument that Baltimore County somehow stands in a different position because of the adoption of its present Charter under Article XI-A of the Maryland Constitution, and Code (1957), Art. 25A, sec. 1. If, as the appellants argue, the rule ought to be changed so as to enlarge the liability of municipal corporations, it must be done by the Legislature and not by this Court. Baltimore v. State, 173 Md. 267, 273; Cox v. Anne Arundel County, 181 Md. 428, 433. Cf. Howard v. South Balto. Gen. Hosp., 191 Md. 617, 619; and Thomas v. Prince George’s County, 200 Md. 554, 559.

Judgment affirmed, costs to be paid by the appellants.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

146 A.2d 28, 218 Md. 271, 1958 Md. LEXIS 526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-wilkerson-v-baltimore-county-md-1958.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack