State Ex Rel. Wilke v. Newton
This text of 186 N.E. 94 (State Ex Rel. Wilke v. Newton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant herein being in default of answer or demurrer to relators’ petition for mandamus, a peremptory mandamus is hereby allowed against the defendant.
It is ordered that the defendant immediately on service of this order permit the relators, Frank E. Wilke and Silas J. Blair, to act as attorneys for plaintiff in that certain action docketed in the court of common pleas of Portage county, Ohio, as civil case No. 12966 entitled “The Union Trust Company, a corporation, plaintiff, vs. Schustrich et al., defendants,” without requiring said relators then to be accompanied by or associated with other counsel; and said defendant is further ordered to accord said relators such rights and privileges in said court while so acting as *641 such attorneys in said action as they may he entitled to be accorded by virtue of their office as members of the Bar of Ohio without imposing as a condition thereof that they then be associated or act in concert with other counsel;
Writ allowed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
186 N.E. 94, 125 Ohio St. 640, 125 Ohio St. (N.S.) 640, 1932 Ohio LEXIS 239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-wilke-v-newton-ohio-1932.