State Ex Rel. Wilke v. Newton

186 N.E. 94, 125 Ohio St. 640, 125 Ohio St. (N.S.) 640, 1932 Ohio LEXIS 239
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 15, 1932·No. 23439·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant herein being in default of answer or demurrer to relators’ petition for mandamus, a peremptory mandamus is hereby allowed against the defendant.

It is ordered that the defendant immediately on service of this order permit the relators, Frank E. Wilke and Silas J. Blair, to act as attorneys for plaintiff in that certain action docketed in the court of common pleas of Portage county, Ohio, as civil case No. 12966 entitled “The Union Trust Company, a corporation, plaintiff, vs. Schustrich et al., defendants,” without requiring said relators then to be accompanied by or associated with other counsel; and said defendant is further ordered to accord said relators such rights and privileges in said court while so acting as *641 such attorneys in said action as they may he entitled to be accorded by virtue of their office as members of the Bar of Ohio without imposing as a condition thereof that they then be associated or act in concert with other counsel;

Writ allowed.

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen, Kinkade and Stephenson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Ex Rel. Wilke v. Newton, 186 N.E. 94, 125 Ohio St. 640, 125 Ohio St. (N.S.) 640, 1932 Ohio LEXIS 239 (Ohio 1932).

186 N.E. 94 (State Ex Rel. Wilke v. Newton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Meyer v. Brinsky
195 N.E. 702 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1935)