State ex rel. Wilke v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Commrs.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Wilke v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Commrs.

722 N.E.2d 522, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1487, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 66

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 18, 2000

Docket99-2325

StatusPublished

This text of 722 N.E.2d 522 (State ex rel. Wilke v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Commrs.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Wilke v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Commrs., 722 N.E.2d 522, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1487, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 66 (Ohio 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that an alternative writ be, and hereby is, granted, and the parties are to brief the case on the merits and the question of whether this cause should be dismissed for failure to file it in the First District Court of Appeals pursuant to R.C. 2101.11(B)(2).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. X:

The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within twenty days of the date of this entry; relator shall file his brief within ten days after the filing of evidence; respondent shall file their briefis) within twenty days after the filing of relator’s brief; and relator may file a reply brief within five days after the filing of respondents’ briefis).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that an alternative writ be, and hereby is, granted, and the parties are to brief the case on the merits and the question of whether this cause should be dismissed for failure to file it in the First District Court of Appeals pursuant to R.C. 2101.11(B)(2).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. X:

The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within twenty days of the date of this entry; relator shall file his brief within ten days after the filing of evidence; respondent shall file their briefis) within twenty days after the filing of relator’s brief; and relator may file a reply brief within five days after the filing of respondents’ briefis).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

722 N.E.2d 522, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1487, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 66, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-wilke-v-hamilton-cty-bd-of-commrs-ohio-2000.