State ex rel. Wiley v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Wiley v. State

999 So. 2d 734, 2009 La. LEXIS 1744, 2009 WL 395160

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided January 21, 2009·No. No. 2008-KH-2920·Published

Opinion

In re Wiley, Marvin; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Terrebonne, 32nd Judicial District Court Div. C, Nos. 331-135, 312-770; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2008 KW 1471.

Relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a successive writ application/motion to quash filed more than 90 days ago. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application/motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court. The district court is ordered to provide this Court with a copy of its judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Wiley, Marvin; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Terrebonne, 32nd Judicial District Court Div. C, Nos. 331-135, 312-770; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2008 KW 1471.

Relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a successive writ application/motion to quash filed more than 90 days ago. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application/motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court. The district court is ordered to provide this Court with a copy of its judgment.

State ex rel. Wiley v. State, 999 So. 2d 734, 2009 La. LEXIS 1744, 2009 WL 395160 (La. 2009).

Pincite

999 So. 2d 734 (State ex rel. Wiley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.