State ex rel. Wieck v. District Court

Montana Supreme Court

State ex rel. Wieck v. District Court

169 P. 1181, 54 Mont. 349, 1918 Mont. LEXIS 2

CourtMontana Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 14, 1918

DocketNo. 4,117

StatusPublished

This text of 169 P. 1181 (State ex rel. Wieck v. District Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Wieck v. District Court, 169 P. 1181, 54 Mont. 349, 1918 Mont. LEXIS 2 (Mo. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

MR. JUSTICE HOLLOWAY

delivered the opinion of the court.

A motion for rehearing was granted upon a showing by respondent that through inadvertence the record certified to this court in the first instance was not correct. The record has been corrected in the court below and a supplemental return made. It appears from the record now before us that the order of January 12, 1917, setting aside the default of the defendants in the case of Anthony Wieck v. F. A. Buttrey and J. W. Wilson, was made by the court “upon agreement of counsel for plaintiff and defendants made in open court.” Under these circumstances there is not any merit in this application.

The order setting aside the default is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Mr. Justice Sanner concurs. Mr. Chief Justice Brantly, being absent, did not hear the argument and takes no part in the foregoing decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MR. JUSTICE HOLLOWAY

delivered the opinion of the court.

A motion for rehearing was granted upon a showing by respondent that through inadvertence the record certified to this court in the first instance was not correct. The record has been corrected in the court below and a supplemental return made. It appears from the record now before us that the order of January 12, 1917, setting aside the default of the defendants in the case of Anthony Wieck v. F. A. Buttrey and J. W. Wilson, was made by the court “upon agreement of counsel for plaintiff and defendants made in open court.” Under these circumstances there is not any merit in this application.

The order setting aside the default is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Mr. Justice Sanner concurs. Mr. Chief Justice Brantly, being absent, did not hear the argument and takes no part in the foregoing decision.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

169 P. 1181, 54 Mont. 349, 1918 Mont. LEXIS 2, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-wieck-v-district-court-mont-1918.