State ex rel. Whittaker v. Criminal District Court, Section "B", Parish of Orleans

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Whittaker v. Criminal District Court, Section "B", Parish of Orleans

578 So. 2d 119, 1991 La. LEXIS 1357, 1991 WL 64542

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided April 23, 1991·No. No. 91-KH-0887·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In re Whittaker, Saul; — Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of prohibition, writ of mandamus, supervisory/remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “B”, No. 252-551.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion to set aside guilty plea he has filed on or about December 17, 1990. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Whittaker, Saul; — Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of prohibition, writ of mandamus, supervisory/remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “B”, No. 252-551.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion to set aside guilty plea he has filed on or about December 17, 1990. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court.

State ex rel. Whittaker v. Criminal District Court, Section "B", Parish of Orleans, 578 So. 2d 119, 1991 La. LEXIS 1357, 1991 WL 64542 (La. 1991).

Pincite

578 So. 2d 119 (State ex rel. Whittaker v. Criminal District Court, Section "B", Parish of Orleans) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related