State ex rel. Whitt v. Coshocton Common Pleas Court

2013 Ohio 3550
Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided August 15, 2013·No. 2012CA0011·Published

Opinion

[Cite as State ex rel. Whitt v. Coshocton Common Pleas Court, 2013-Ohio-3550.]

COURT OF APPEALS COSHOCTON COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

STATE OF OHIO, ex rel., STEPHEN H. JUDGES: WHITT Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P. J. Hon. Sheila G. Farmer, J. Relator Hon. John W. Wise, J.

-vs- Case No. 2013CA0011 COSHOCTON COMMON PLEAS COURT

Respondent OPINION

CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Petition for Writ of Mandamus

JUDGMENT: Dismissed

DATE OF JUDGMENT ENTRY: August 15, 2013

APPEARANCES:

For Relator For Respondent

STEPHEN H. WHITT JASON W. GIVEN L. E. C. I. PROSECUTING ATTORNEY Post Office Box 56 318 Chestnut Street Lebanon, Ohio 45036 Coshocton, Ohio 43812 Coshocton County, Case No. 2013CA0011 2

Wise, J.

{¶1} Relator, Stephen H. Whitt, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus.

Although it is not entirely clear what relief Relator seeks, the Court believes Relator is

requesting the Respondent be ordered to cause certain people to be arrested on

kidnapping charges.

{¶2} Respondent has filed a motion to dismiss essentially arguing Relator has

no clear legal right to the relief requested.

{¶3} We find it unnecessary to address the claim raised in the Petition because

we find Relator has failed to comply with the procedural requirements for a mandamus

complaint.

{¶4} Relator has failed to comply with R.C. 2969.25 by failing to file an affidavit

detailing his prior civil filings. The Supreme Court has held, “[t]he requirements of R.C.

2969.25 are mandatory, and failure to comply with them subjects an inmate's action to

dismissal.” State ex rel. White v. Bechtel, 99 Ohio St.3d 11, 2003–Ohio–2262, 788

N.E.2d 634, ¶ 5. Noncompliance with R.C. 2969.25 warrants dismissal. State ex rel.

Graham v. Niemeyer (2005), 106 Ohio St.3d 466, 106–467, 835 N.E.2d 1250, 1251. Coshocton County, Case No. 2012CA0011 3

{¶5} Relator's failure to include the affidavit requires dismissal of this case. For

this reason, the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is dismissed.

By: Wise, J.

Gwin, P. J., and

Farmer, J., concur.

___________________________________ HON. JOHN W. WISE

___________________________________ HON. W. SCOTT GWIN

___________________________________ HON. SHEILA G. FARMER

JWW/d 0722 Coshocton County, Case No. 2013CA0011 4

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR COSHOCTON COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

STATE OF OHIO, ex rel., STEPHEN H. : WHITT : : Relator : : -vs- : JUDGMENT ENTRY : COSHOCTON COMMON PLEAS COURT : : Respondent : Case No. 2013CA0011

For the reasons stated in our accompanying Memorandum-Opinion, the Petition

for Writ of Mandamus filed in the Court of Common Pleas of Coshocton County, Ohio, is

dismissed.

Costs assessed to Relator.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Whitt v. Coshocton Common Pleas Court, 2013 Ohio 3550 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013).

2013 Ohio 3550 (State ex rel. Whitt v. Coshocton Common Pleas Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. White v. Bechtel
99 Ohio St. 3d 11 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2003)
State ex rel. Graham v. Niemeyer
106 Ohio St. 3d 466 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2005)