State ex rel. Whitmore v. Criminal District Court, Division I, Parish of East Baton Rouge

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Whitmore v. Criminal District Court, Division I, Parish of East Baton Rouge

621 So. 2d 824, 1993 La. LEXIS 2358, 1993 WL 305613

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedAugust 10, 1993

DocketNo. 93-KH-1979

StatusPublished

This text of 621 So. 2d 824 (State ex rel. Whitmore v. Criminal District Court, Division I, Parish of East Baton Rouge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Whitmore v. Criminal District Court, Division I, Parish of East Baton Rouge, 621 So. 2d 824, 1993 La. LEXIS 2358, 1993 WL 305613 (La. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Whitmore, Kenny; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “I”, No. 5-75-8865.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an amended application for post-conviction relief he has filed in March of 1992 and supplemented in August 1992. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file, and act upon the relator’s application which is herewith transferred to the district court.

LEMMON, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Whitmore, Kenny; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “I”, No. 5-75-8865.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an amended application for post-conviction relief he has filed in March of 1992 and supplemented in August 1992. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file, and act upon the relator’s application which is herewith transferred to the district court.

LEMMON, J., not on panel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

621 So. 2d 824, 1993 La. LEXIS 2358, 1993 WL 305613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-whitmore-v-criminal-district-court-division-i-parish-of-la-1993.