State ex rel. Whited v. Mayo
This text of 65 So. 2d 50 (State ex rel. Whited v. Mayo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal by appellant in habeas corpus proceedings wherein petition was filed in the Circuit Court in and íor Alachua County after appellant was convicted on a plea of guilty to an information charging incest in the Criminal Court of Record of Hillsborough County, Florida. The petition was dismissed for insufficiency.
The contention of appellant is that he was denied due process of law in that he was ignorant of his right to have legal counsel and was not provided with such counsel in the proceedings in' the Criminal Court of Record, .supra.
The petition is insufficient in its allegations to show that appellant is entitled, to the relief sought and the judgment of dismissal should be .affirmed on authority of Bute v. Illinois, 333 U.S. 640, 68 S.Ct. 763, 92 L.Ed. 986 and O’Connell ex rel. Kwong Han Foo v. Ward, 1 Cir., 126 F.2d 615.
It is so ordered.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
65 So. 2d 50, 1953 Fla. LEXIS 1277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-whited-v-mayo-fla-1953.