State ex rel. White v. Enright
605 N.E.2d 44, 65 Ohio St. 3d 481
Opinion
The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed. Appellant ignored two notices from the court of appeals to file his brief, and ignored the first notice for more than two months. We find no abuse of discretion in the court’s dismissal of the action for want of prosecution under these facts.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State ex rel. White v. Enright, 605 N.E.2d 44, 65 Ohio St. 3d 481 (Ohio 1992).
605 N.E.2d 44 (State ex rel. White v. Enright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Boccuzzi v. Cuyahoga Cty. Commrs., Unpublished Decision (4-11-2006)
2006 Ohio 1835 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2006)
State v. Corrigan, Unpublished Decision (9-29-2003)
2003 Ohio 5256 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2003)
Capers v. White, Unpublished Decision (4-17-2002)
Ohio Court of Appeals, 2002
State v. Fuerst, Unpublished Decision (07-19-2001)
Ohio Court of Appeals, 2001
State Ex Rel. Short v. Taylor, Unpublished Decision (7-8-1999)
Ohio Court of Appeals, 1999