State ex rel. White v. Enright

605 N.E.2d 44, 65 Ohio St. 3d 481
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 11, 1992
DocketNo. 92-1552
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 605 N.E.2d 44 (State ex rel. White v. Enright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. White v. Enright, 605 N.E.2d 44, 65 Ohio St. 3d 481 (Ohio 1992).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed. Appellant ignored two notices from the court of appeals to file his brief, and ignored the first notice for more than two months. We find no abuse of discretion in the court’s dismissal of the action for want of prosecution under these facts.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
605 N.E.2d 44, 65 Ohio St. 3d 481, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-white-v-enright-ohio-1992.