State ex rel. Whitaker v. Scioto Cty. Common Pleas Court

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Whitaker v. Scioto Cty. Common Pleas Court

934 N.E.2d 350, 126 Ohio St. 3d 1576

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 29, 2010·No. 2010-1127·Published

Opinion

In Mandamus. On respondent’s answer and motion for judgment on the pleadings and relator’s motion to amend complaint. Motion to amend complaint denied. Motion for judgment on the pleadings granted. Cause dismissed.

Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Brown, C.J., dissents and would grant the motion to amend complaint and defer ruling on the motion for judgment on the pleadings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus. On respondent’s answer and motion for judgment on the pleadings and relator’s motion to amend complaint. Motion to amend complaint denied. Motion for judgment on the pleadings granted. Cause dismissed.

Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Brown, C.J., dissents and would grant the motion to amend complaint and defer ruling on the motion for judgment on the pleadings.

State ex rel. Whitaker v. Scioto Cty. Common Pleas Court, 934 N.E.2d 350, 126 Ohio St. 3d 1576 (Ohio 2010).

Pincite

934 N.E.2d 350 (State ex rel. Whitaker v. Scioto Cty. Common Pleas Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.