State Ex Rel. Wheelock v. Wiles, Judge
This text of 78 N.E.2d 432 (State Ex Rel. Wheelock v. Wiles, Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an original action wherein relator asks this court to mandate respondent to appoint attorneys to prosecute an appeal for relator from a judgment in a coram nobis proceeding.
Under State ex rel. Cutsinger v. Spencer, Judge (1941), 219 Ind. 148, 41 N. E. (2d) 601; State ex rel. Sawa v. Criminal Court of Lake County (1941), 220 Ind. 4, 50 N. E. (2d) 971; State ex rel. Barnes v. Howard (1946), ante, p. 107, 65 N. E. (2d) 55, relator is not entitled to have counsel appointed by this court to prosecute such appeal. The legislature has provided a public defender to represent relator and for him to appeal in proper cases from coram nobis judgments. Acts of 1945, ch. 38.
Relator therefore is not entitled to the relief asked and said petition should be and is hereby denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
78 N.E.2d 432, 224 Ind. 239, 1946 Ind. LEXIS 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-wheelock-v-wiles-judge-ind-1946.