State Ex Rel. Wheelock v. Wiles, Judge

78 N.E.2d 432, 224 Ind. 239, 1946 Ind. LEXIS 113
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided May 9, 1946·No. No. 28,185.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

YOUNG, J.

This is an original action wherein relator asks this court to mandate respondent to appoint attorneys to prosecute an appeal for relator from a judgment in a coram nobis proceeding.

Under State ex rel. Cutsinger v. Spencer, Judge (1941), 219 Ind. 148, 41 N. E. (2d) 601; State ex rel. Sawa v. Criminal Court of Lake County (1941), 220 Ind. 4, 50 N. E. (2d) 971; State ex rel. Barnes v. Howard (1946), ante, p. 107, 65 N. E. (2d) 55, relator is not entitled to have counsel appointed by this court to prosecute such appeal. The legislature has provided a public defender to represent relator and for him to appeal in proper cases from coram nobis judgments. Acts of 1945, ch. 38.

Relator therefore is not entitled to the relief asked and said petition should be and is hereby denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Ex Rel. Wheelock v. Wiles, Judge, 78 N.E.2d 432, 224 Ind. 239, 1946 Ind. LEXIS 113 (Ind. 1946).

78 N.E.2d 432 (State Ex Rel. Wheelock v. Wiles, Judge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Green v. State
103 N.E.2d 429 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1952)
Indianapolis Brewing Co. v. Bingham
78 N.E.2d 432 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1948)