State ex rel. Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp. v. Industrial Commission

115 Ohio St. 3d 372
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 11, 2007
DocketNo. 2006-1576
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 115 Ohio St. 3d 372 (State ex rel. Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp. v. Industrial Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp. v. Industrial Commission, 115 Ohio St. 3d 372 (Ohio 2007).

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, L.L.P., Bradley K. Sinnott, and Bethany R. Spain, for appellee Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corporation. Marc Dann, Attorney General, and Sandra E. Pinkerton, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio. Larrimer & Larrimer and Thomas L. Reitz, for appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp. v. Indus. Comm.
877 N.E.2d 992 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
115 Ohio St. 3d 372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-wheeling-pittsburgh-steel-corp-v-industrial-commission-ohio-2007.