State ex rel. Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp. v. Bruzzese

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp. v. Bruzzese

678 N.E.2d 579, 78 Ohio St. 3d 1470

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 30, 1997

Docket97-771

StatusPublished

This text of 678 N.E.2d 579 (State ex rel. Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp. v. Bruzzese) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp. v. Bruzzese, 678 N.E.2d 579, 78 Ohio St. 3d 1470 (Ohio 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for writs of mandamus and prohibition and was considered in a manner prescribed by law. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed, sua sponte.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., concurs and would also award respondent reasonable attorney fees. Douglas, J., dissents and would grant an alternative writ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for writs of mandamus and prohibition and was considered in a manner prescribed by law. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed, sua sponte.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., concurs and would also award respondent reasonable attorney fees. Douglas, J., dissents and would grant an alternative writ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

678 N.E.2d 579, 78 Ohio St. 3d 1470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-wheeling-pittsburgh-steel-corp-v-bruzzese-ohio-1997.