State ex rel. Westberry v. Mayo

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State ex rel. Westberry v. Mayo

112 So. 2d 916, 1959 Fla. App. LEXIS 3786

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 21, 1959·No. No. 1298·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The petitioner, Richard Wayne West-berry, has filed in this Court an application for a writ of habeas corpus and the Court having heard argument of counsel for the petitioner and for the respondent, it is, upon consideration,

[917]*917Ordered that the said petition for writ of habeas corpus be and the same is hereby denied.

It appearing to the Court that the sentence imposed in the case in which the petitioner was charged with “Entering Without Breaking”, Information Number 1369, was in excess of that permitted by statute, the Attorney General is requested to take appropriate action to the end that a proper sentence may be imposed in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petitioner, Richard Wayne West-berry, has filed in this Court an application for a writ of habeas corpus and the Court having heard argument of counsel for the petitioner and for the respondent, it is, upon consideration,

[917]*917Ordered that the said petition for writ of habeas corpus be and the same is hereby denied.

It appearing to the Court that the sentence imposed in the case in which the petitioner was charged with “Entering Without Breaking”, Information Number 1369, was in excess of that permitted by statute, the Attorney General is requested to take appropriate action to the end that a proper sentence may be imposed in this case.

State ex rel. Westberry v. Mayo, 112 So. 2d 916, 1959 Fla. App. LEXIS 3786 (Fla. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

112 So. 2d 916 (State ex rel. Westberry v. Mayo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related