State ex rel. Wessel v. Indus. Comm.

1998 Ohio 102, 83 Ohio St. 3d 334
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 7, 1998·No. 1996-2500·Published

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 83 Ohio St.3d 334.]

THE STATE EX REL. WESSEL, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Wessel v. Indus. Comm., 1998-Ohio-102.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 96-2500—Submitted August 19, 1998—Decided October 7, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 95APD11-1520. __________________ Ticktin, Baron, Koepper & Co., L.P.A., and Harold Ticktin, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and William J. McDonald, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission. Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease and Julie M. Larson, for appellee Mobil Oil Corporation. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. PFEIFER, J., dissents. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Wessel v. Indus. Comm., 1998 Ohio 102, 83 Ohio St. 3d 334 (Ohio 1998).

1998 Ohio 102 (State ex rel. Wessel v. Indus. Comm.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.