State ex rel. Wenneker v. Gavin

Supreme Court of Missouri

State ex rel. Wenneker v. Gavin

81 S.W. 162, 181 Mo. 698, 1904 Mo. LEXIS 147

DecidedMay 25, 1904

StatusPublished

This text of 81 S.W. 162 (State ex rel. Wenneker v. Gavin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Wenneker v. Gavin, 81 S.W. 162, 181 Mo. 698, 1904 Mo. LEXIS 147 (Mo. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

VALLIANT, J.

This is a suit of the same nature as that in the case of this plaintiff against W. F. Boyle, just decided, except that in this case the record shows that there was a trial on the merits, and a finding and judgment for the defendant. The record shows that there was a motion for a new trial, which was overruled, and an appeal taken, but there is no bill of exceptions in the case. Appellant does not claim that on the face of the record proper there is any error, but he asks to have the judgment reversed on grounds that can be brought to our notice only by a bill of exceptions. For the reason given in affirming the judgment in the Boyle case the judgment in this case is affirmed.

All concur, except Robinson, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

VALLIANT, J.

This is a suit of the same nature as that in the case of this plaintiff against W. F. Boyle, just decided, except that in this case the record shows that there was a trial on the merits, and a finding and judgment for the defendant. The record shows that there was a motion for a new trial, which was overruled, and an appeal taken, but there is no bill of exceptions in the case. Appellant does not claim that on the face of the record proper there is any error, but he asks to have the judgment reversed on grounds that can be brought to our notice only by a bill of exceptions. For the reason given in affirming the judgment in the Boyle case the judgment in this case is affirmed.

All concur, except Robinson, J., absent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

81 S.W. 162, 181 Mo. 698, 1904 Mo. LEXIS 147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-wenneker-v-gavin-mo-1904.