State ex rel. Wellington v. Mahoning Cty. Bd. of Elections

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Wellington v. Mahoning Cty. Bd. of Elections

894 N.E.2d 699, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1480

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 9, 2008·No. 2008-1936·Published

Opinion

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition involving an expedited election matter. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that the briefing in this ease shall proceed as follows: The parties shall file their briefs and evidence within five days of the filing of the response. The Clerk shall refuse to file any reply briefs or requests for extension of time.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition involving an expedited election matter. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that the briefing in this ease shall proceed as follows: The parties shall file their briefs and evidence within five days of the filing of the response. The Clerk shall refuse to file any reply briefs or requests for extension of time.

State ex rel. Wellington v. Mahoning Cty. Bd. of Elections, 894 N.E.2d 699, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1480 (Ohio 2008).

Pincite

894 N.E.2d 699 (State ex rel. Wellington v. Mahoning Cty. Bd. of Elections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.