State ex rel. Wehrung v. Dinkelacker

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Wehrung v. Dinkelacker

737 N.E.2d 52, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1447, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2695

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 24, 2000

Docket00-1829

StatusPublished

This text of 737 N.E.2d 52 (State ex rel. Wehrung v. Dinkelacker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Wehrung v. Dinkelacker, 737 N.E.2d 52, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1447, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2695 (Ohio 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

Hamilton App. No. C-000449. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County. Upon consideration of appellant’s revised motion for stay of proceedings in the trial court,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the revised motion for stay of proceedings in the trial court be, and hereby is, granted, to the extent that the stay applies to the actual trial only and not pretrial proceedings.

F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamilton App. No. C-000449. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County. Upon consideration of appellant’s revised motion for stay of proceedings in the trial court,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the revised motion for stay of proceedings in the trial court be, and hereby is, granted, to the extent that the stay applies to the actual trial only and not pretrial proceedings.

F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

737 N.E.2d 52, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1447, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-wehrung-v-dinkelacker-ohio-2000.