State ex rel. Webster v. San Juan Products, Inc.
This text of 728 S.W.2d 735 (State ex rel. Webster v. San Juan Products, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Appellant, San Juan Products, Incorporated brings this appeal from a judgment finding that it had committed thirteen separate violations of a February 9, 1983 mandatory injunction entered pursuant to Chapter 407 RSMo 1978,1 the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act, more specifically, Section 407.100 RSMo 1978, and assessing the five thousand dollar civil penalty authorized by Section 407.110 RSMo 1978 for each violation.
This court is obligated when it has a case before it to examine sua sponte the issue of its own jurisdiction. Since our jurisdiction is derivative of the trial court’s jurisdiction, we also are under an obligation to examine the issue of the trial court’s jurisdiction. See, Schneider v. Sunset Pools of St. Louis, Inc., 700 S.W.2d 137, 138 (Mo.App.1985). We have done so in the case sub judice and have concluded, for reasons more fully explained in a separate memorandum to the parties, that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to enter the order and judgment appealed from. This court has no jurisdiction to review a judgment entered in excess of or beyond the jurisdiction of the trial court, Schneider, Id.
We therefore dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction in the trial court and the trial court’s judgment is vacated.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
728 S.W.2d 735, 1987 Mo. App. LEXIS 4042, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-webster-v-san-juan-products-inc-moctapp-1987.