State ex rel. Webb v. Satz

Supreme Court of Missouri

State ex rel. Webb v. Satz

606 S.W.2d 176, 1980 Mo. LEXIS 444

CourtSupreme Court of Missouri

DecidedJune 10, 1980

DocketNos. 60231, 60269

StatusPublished

This text of 606 S.W.2d 176 (State ex rel. Webb v. Satz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Webb v. Satz, 606 S.W.2d 176, 1980 Mo. LEXIS 444 (Mo. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

It has come to the attention of the court that there is an error in the body of the above opinion. At 561 S.W.2d l. c. 115, the opinion contains the following statement:

“Thus, venue in both cases before us is proper.”

This statement is erroneous. It is not what was intended. The statement was intended to read as follows:

“Thus, venue in one of the cases before us is proper, but not in the other.”

The statement as intended is, of course, consistent with the reasoning and analysis used in the opinion respecting venue in suits against corporations. It also is consistent with the result of the case which made the provisional rule of prohibition absolute in one case (Webb) and quashed the provisional rule in prohibition in the other (Noran-da).

The above and foregoing opinion is therefore modified on the court’s own motion by correcting the sentence appearing at 561 S.W.2d 1. c. 115 as set forth herein.

All of the judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI