State ex rel. Weaver v. Sheehan

2023 Ohio 3890
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 20, 2023
Docket113194
StatusPublished

This text of 2023 Ohio 3890 (State ex rel. Weaver v. Sheehan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Weaver v. Sheehan, 2023 Ohio 3890 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

[Cite as State ex rel. Weaver v. Sheehan, 2023-Ohio-3890.]

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO

EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA

STATE EX REL., DANIEL WEAVER, :

Relator, No. 113194 : v. : JUDGE BRENDAN SHEEHAN ADMINISTRATIVE/PRESIDING JUDGE, :

Respondent. :

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION

JUDGMENT: WRIT DENIED DATED: October 20, 2023

Writ of Procedendo Motion No. 568555 Order No. 568668

Appearances:

Deanna Robertson, for relator.

Michael C. O’Malley, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and James E. Moss, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for respondent.

EMANUELLA D. GROVES, J.:

Daniel Weaver, the relator, has filed a complaint for a writ of

procedendo. Weaver seeks an order from this court that compels Judge Brendan Sheehan, the respondent, to render a ruling with regard to an application for

expungement/sealing of the criminal conviction, filed November 6, 2020, in State

v. Weaver, Cuyahoga C.P. No. CR-20-654316-A. Judge Sheehan has filed a motion

for summary judgment that is granted.

Attached to the motion for summary judgment is a copy of judgment

entry, journalized October 12, 2023, which demonstrates that Judge Sheehan has

granted Weaver’s application for expungement/sealing of the criminal conviction in

CR-20-654316-A. Relief is unwarranted because the request for a writ of

procedendo is moot. Procedendo will not compel the performance of a duty that has

already been performed. State ex rel. Ames v. Pokorny, 164 Ohio St.3d 538, 2021-

Ohio-2070, 173 N.E.3d 1208; Thompson v. Donnelly, 155 Ohio St.3d 184, 2018-

Ohio-4073, 119 N.E.3d 1292; State ex rel. S.Y.C. v. Floyd, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No.

109602, 2020-Ohio-5189. See also State ex rel. Williams v. Croce, 153 Ohio St.3d

348, 2018-Ohio-2703, 106 N.E.3d 55; State ex rel. Hopson v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court

of Common Pleas, 135 Ohio St.3d 456, 2013-Ohio-1911, 989 N.E.2d 49; State ex rel.

Fontanella v. Kontos, 117 Ohio St.3d 514, 2008-Ohio-1431, 885 N.E.2d 220.

Writ denied.

________________________ EMANUELLA D. GROVES, JUDGE

MARY EILEEN KILBANE, P.J., and MARY J. BOYLE, J., CONCUR

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Hopson v. Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas
2013 Ohio 1911 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2013)
State ex rel. Williams v. Croce (Slip Opinion)
2018 Ohio 2703 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2018)
Thompson v. Donnelly (Slip Opinion)
2018 Ohio 4073 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2018)
State ex rel. Ames v. Pokorny (Slip Opinion)
2021 Ohio 2070 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2021)
State ex rel. Fontanella v. Kontos
117 Ohio St. 3d 514 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2023 Ohio 3890, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-weaver-v-sheehan-ohioctapp-2023.