State ex rel. Waxter v. State

667 So. 2d 1038, 1996 La. LEXIS 508, 1996 WL 71121
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedFebruary 16, 1996
DocketNo. 96-KH-0027
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 667 So. 2d 1038 (State ex rel. Waxter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Waxter v. State, 667 So. 2d 1038, 1996 La. LEXIS 508, 1996 WL 71121 (La. 1996).

Opinion

In re Waxter, Kenneth; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “E”, No. 273-001.

Relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for production of documents he filed on or about November 1, 1994. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file, and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court. The district court is ordered to provide this Court with a copy of its judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Waxter v. State
696 So. 2d 985 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
667 So. 2d 1038, 1996 La. LEXIS 508, 1996 WL 71121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-waxter-v-state-la-1996.