State ex rel. Watterson v. Disciplinary Counsel

862 N.E.2d 114, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1486
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 28, 2007
Docket2006-2290
StatusPublished

This text of 862 N.E.2d 114 (State ex rel. Watterson v. Disciplinary Counsel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Watterson v. Disciplinary Counsel, 862 N.E.2d 114, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1486 (Ohio 2007).

Opinion

In Mandamus. On respondent’s motion to dismiss and relator’s motion for leave to file amended writ of mandamus. Motion to dismiss granted. Motion for leave to file amended writ of mandamus denied. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
862 N.E.2d 114, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-watterson-v-disciplinary-counsel-ohio-2007.