State ex rel. Watson v. Spicer

679 N.E.2d 1139, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1413, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 3874
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJune 11, 1997
Docket97-1076
StatusPublished

This text of 679 N.E.2d 1139 (State ex rel. Watson v. Spicer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Watson v. Spicer, 679 N.E.2d 1139, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1413, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 3874 (Ohio 1997).

Opinion

In Mandamus and Procedendo. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for writs of mandamus and procedendo. Upon consideration of relators’ motion to expedite,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to expedite be, and hereby is, denied.

Douglas, J., dissents and would grant the motion and set a briefing schedule.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
679 N.E.2d 1139, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1413, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 3874, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-watson-v-spicer-ohio-1997.