State Ex Rel. Watson v. Lee

28 So. 2d 104, 158 Fla. 148, 1946 Fla. LEXIS 500
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 26, 1946·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is a suit to enjoin the Comptroller and Treasurer from doing anything to carry into effect the provisions of Chapter 22831 upon a general charge that the act is unconstitutional and upon the charge that the act is broader than the title.

As to the general charge that the act is so defective as to justify the court’s enjoining the Comptroller and Treasurer we find the bill is without equity.

As to the contention that the body of the act is broader than the title, again we find the bill is without equity and the chancellor properly dismissed the bill.

*149 Without adjudicating the propriety of the proceedings now before us and in the absence of any question having been raised in that regard and no error having been made to appear we hold that the decree of the lower court is affirmed.

CHAPMAN, C. J., TERRELL, BROWN, BUFORD, THOMAS and ADAMS, JJ., and BARNS, Circuit Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Ex Rel. Watson v. Lee, 28 So. 2d 104, 158 Fla. 148, 1946 Fla. LEXIS 500 (Fla. 1946).

28 So. 2d 104 (State Ex Rel. Watson v. Lee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Farmer
130 So. 2d 601 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1961)