State ex rel. Watson v. Indus. Comm.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 83 Ohio St.3d 145.]
THE STATE EX REL. WATSON, APPELLEE, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL.; HARTS STORES, INC., APPELLANT.
[Cite as State ex rel. Watson v. Indus. Comm., 1998-Ohio-157.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 96-2325—Submitted July 8, 1998—Decided September 16, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 95APD08-1059. __________________ Lonas & McGonegal and Terrance J. McGonegal, for appellee. Gibson & Robbins-Penniman, Corrine S. Carman and Gus Robbins- Penniman, for appellant. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur. COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent. __________________ LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I dissent and would reverse the court of appeals and affirm the Industrial Commission’s order. COOK, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
1998 Ohio 157 (State ex rel. Watson v. Indus. Comm.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.