Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State Ex Rel. Watmough v. Cortland Banking Co.

State Ex Rel. Watmough v. Cortland Banking Co.

166 N.E. 200, 119 Ohio St. 650, 119 Ohio St. (N.S.) 650, 6 Ohio Law. Abs. 725, 1928 Ohio LEXIS 238
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 24, 1928
Docket21327
StatusPublished

This text of 166 N.E. 200 (State Ex Rel. Watmough v. Cortland Banking Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Ex Rel. Watmough v. Cortland Banking Co., 166 N.E. 200, 119 Ohio St. 650, 119 Ohio St. (N.S.) 650, 6 Ohio Law. Abs. 725, 1928 Ohio LEXIS 238 (Ohio 1928).

Opinion

It is ordered that a peremptory writ of mandamus be issued against The Cortland Banking Company ccmmanding it to deliver to relators or to such persons as they may legally designate, by proper *651 checks or vouchers, all or any part of all funds now in the possession of The Cortland Banking Company of Cortland, Ohio, belonging to the New Bazetta Township Rural School District of Trumbull County, Ohio. (State, ex rel. Grace, v. Howard, Treas., 101 Ohio St., 532, approved and followed.)

Writ allowed.

Marshall, C. J., Day, Allen, Kinkade, Robinson, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
166 N.E. 200, 119 Ohio St. 650, 119 Ohio St. (N.S.) 650, 6 Ohio Law. Abs. 725, 1928 Ohio LEXIS 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-watmough-v-cortland-banking-co-ohio-1928.