State ex rel. Watkins v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Watkins v. State

556 So. 2d 44, 1990 La. LEXIS 84, 1990 WL 2445

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJanuary 10, 1990

DocketNo. 89-KH-3028

StatusPublished

This text of 556 So. 2d 44 (State ex rel. Watkins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Watkins v. State, 556 So. 2d 44, 1990 La. LEXIS 84, 1990 WL 2445 (La. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Watkins, Lenny James; —Plaintiffs); applying for writ of mandamus and supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KW89 2006; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 2-77-294.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for guilty plea transcript he claims to have filed on or about September 30, 1989. If [45]*45relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Watkins, Lenny James; —Plaintiffs); applying for writ of mandamus and supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KW89 2006; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 2-77-294.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for guilty plea transcript he claims to have filed on or about September 30, 1989. If [45]*45relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

556 So. 2d 44, 1990 La. LEXIS 84, 1990 WL 2445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-watkins-v-state-la-1990.