State ex rel. Watkins v. Baten

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Watkins v. Baten

21 So. 119, 48 La. Ann. 1538, 1896 La. LEXIS 690

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedDecember 14, 1896

DocketNo. 12,337

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 21 So. 119 (State ex rel. Watkins v. Baten) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Watkins v. Baten, 21 So. 119, 48 La. Ann. 1538, 1896 La. LEXIS 690 (La. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

[1539]*1539The opinion of the court was delivered by

McEnery, J.

The relator applies for a mandamus, under the supervisory jurisdiction of this court, to compel the respondent judge to proceed with a suit filed by him, aud to enter up judgment in the case.

In the suit of relator against one Gilford Sampson, filed in the respondent’s court, the magistrate dismissed- the case because of want of jurisdiction. This order of dismissal was on the motion of the magistrate who took notice of the fact that the obligation sued on was more than five years’ standing, and in his opinion the obligation was prescribed, and as there was nothing due he could not entertain the suit. In his return he alleges that he bases his action upon an opinion and decree recently rendered by the Circuit Court of Appeals in this circuit. We are inclined to believe that the respondent judge is in error in interpreting some decree of that court.

Prescription can not be supplied by the judge. It must be specially pleaded by the defendant. In this case the obligation sued on was for the sum of ten dollars. When it was executed the defendant waived citation and confessed judgment for the amount. The waiving of citation was a personal privilege, which he could do in advance, and he could confess judgment at the same time. The hardship, if any, is of his own making. Stein vs. Brunner, 42 An. 72.

The duty of the judge was very plain. In the absence of any appearance of the defendant, or any plea filed by him, to enter judgment against the defendant. Id.

The relief prayed for is granted, and the mandamus made peremptory.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[1539]*1539The opinion of the court was delivered by

McEnery, J.

The relator applies for a mandamus, under the supervisory jurisdiction of this court, to compel the respondent judge to proceed with a suit filed by him, aud to enter up judgment in the case.

In the suit of relator against one Gilford Sampson, filed in the respondent’s court, the magistrate dismissed- the case because of want of jurisdiction. This order of dismissal was on the motion of the magistrate who took notice of the fact that the obligation sued on was more than five years’ standing, and in his opinion the obligation was prescribed, and as there was nothing due he could not entertain the suit. In his return he alleges that he bases his action upon an opinion and decree recently rendered by the Circuit Court of Appeals in this circuit. We are inclined to believe that the respondent judge is in error in interpreting some decree of that court.

Prescription can not be supplied by the judge. It must be specially pleaded by the defendant. In this case the obligation sued on was for the sum of ten dollars. When it was executed the defendant waived citation and confessed judgment for the amount. The waiving of citation was a personal privilege, which he could do in advance, and he could confess judgment at the same time. The hardship, if any, is of his own making. Stein vs. Brunner, 42 An. 72.

The duty of the judge was very plain. In the absence of any appearance of the defendant, or any plea filed by him, to enter judgment against the defendant. Id.

The relief prayed for is granted, and the mandamus made peremptory.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 So. 119, 48 La. Ann. 1538, 1896 La. LEXIS 690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-watkins-v-baten-la-1896.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack