State ex rel. Waterloo Brown Derby Restaurant v. Summit County Board of Elections

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Waterloo Brown Derby Restaurant v. Summit County Board of Elections

298 N.E.2d 134, 34 Ohio St. 2d 259, 63 Ohio Op. 2d 396, 1973 Ohio LEXIS 380

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 20, 1973·No. Nos. 72-838, 72-844 and 72-845·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The word “district,” as used in B. C. 4301.37, must be held to include all precincts making up any residence district in which a local option election has been held pursuant to petitions filed in compliance with B. C. 4301.33 so as to prevent the holding of another such election more often than once in each four-year period in any part of that district.

To hold otherwise would be to grant petitioners the opportunity to achieve election results favorable to their views by a continuous juggling of precincts under a claim that new districts are created, and thus defeat the apparent intent of the General Assembly to achieve some stability in such matters.

The judgments of the Court of Appeals are affirmed.

Judgments affirmed.

O ’Nemo, C. J., Hebbebt, Steen, Celebeezze, W. Bbown and P. Bbown, JJ., concur. Cobbigan, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The word “district,” as used in B. C. 4301.37, must be held to include all precincts making up any residence district in which a local option election has been held pursuant to petitions filed in compliance with B. C. 4301.33 so as to prevent the holding of another such election more often than once in each four-year period in any part of that district.

To hold otherwise would be to grant petitioners the opportunity to achieve election results favorable to their views by a continuous juggling of precincts under a claim that new districts are created, and thus defeat the apparent intent of the General Assembly to achieve some stability in such matters.

The judgments of the Court of Appeals are affirmed.

Judgments affirmed.

O ’Nemo, C. J., Hebbebt, Steen, Celebeezze, W. Bbown and P. Bbown, JJ., concur. Cobbigan, J., dissents.

State ex rel. Waterloo Brown Derby Restaurant v. Summit County Board of Elections, 298 N.E.2d 134, 34 Ohio St. 2d 259, 63 Ohio Op. 2d 396, 1973 Ohio LEXIS 380 (Ohio 1973).

Pincite

298 N.E.2d 134 (State ex rel. Waterloo Brown Derby Restaurant v. Summit County Board of Elections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related